Using Google Docs for Collaborative Revision in EFL Academic Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58540/jipe.v1i2.1385Abstract
This study explores the use of Google Docs as a collaborative tool to support the revision process in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) academic writing. Employing a qualitative descriptive research design, the study involved six EFL university students enrolled in an academic writing course at a private university in Indonesia. Data were collected through an open-ended questionnaire and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings reveal that Google Docs facilitated continuous and multi-stage revision through features such as commenting, suggestion mode, and real-time editing. Peer feedback played a central role in shaping students’ revisions, particularly in improving clarity, organization, and language accuracy. Students also perceived several benefits, including increased awareness of writing weaknesses, greater participation, and reduced anxiety during revision. However, challenges such as unclear feedback, unequal participation, and technical issues were also identified. The study concludes that Google Docs supports a process-oriented and interactive approach to revision and has the potential to enhance collaborative academic writing when accompanied by appropriate pedagogical guidance
References
Alwahoub, H. M., Jomaa, N. J., & Azmi, M. N. L. (2022). The impact of synchronous collaborative writing and Google Docs collaborative features on enhancing students’ individual writing performance. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46541
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Sa’diyah, H., & Nabhan, S. (2021). Collaborative writing using Google Docs in an EFL classroom: Voices from high school students. Voices of English Language Education Society, 5(2), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v5i2.3863
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
Wahyuningsih, I., Herawati, H., & Prabandari, C. S. (2023). Students’ perceptions of the use of Google Docs for online collaborative writing. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(2), 770–783. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i2.6142
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2026-04-07 (6)
- 2026-03-15 (5)
- 2026-03-11 (4)
- 2026-03-11 (3)
- 2026-03-11 (2)
- 2026-02-13 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal Innovative Practices in Education (JIPE)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





